1978 Mazda 616 vs. 2003 Ford Laser
To start off, 2003 Ford Laser is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Mazda 616. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Mazda 616 would be higher. At 1,598 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Ford Laser is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Ford Laser (105 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 26 more horse power than 1978 Mazda 616. (79 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Ford Laser should accelerate faster than 1978 Mazda 616. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Ford Laser weights approximately 203 kg more than 1978 Mazda 616. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2003 Ford Laser (145 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 21 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 Mazda 616. (124 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2003 Ford Laser will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 Mazda 616.
Compare all specifications:
1978 Mazda 616 | 2003 Ford Laser | |
Make | Mazda | Ford |
Model | 616 | Laser |
Year Released | 1978 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1586 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 79 HP | 105 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 124 Nm | 145 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 78 mm | 79 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 83 mm | 81.3 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 912 kg | 1115 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4160 mm | 4260 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2620 mm |