1978 Mazda 616 vs. 2012 Chevrolet Malibu
To start off, 2012 Chevrolet Malibu is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Mazda 616. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Mazda 616 would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Chevrolet Malibu is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Chevrolet Malibu (252 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 173 more horse power than 1978 Mazda 616. (79 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Chevrolet Malibu should accelerate faster than 1978 Mazda 616.
Let's talk about torque, 2012 Chevrolet Malibu (340 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 216 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 Mazda 616. (124 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2012 Chevrolet Malibu will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 Mazda 616.
Compare all specifications:
1978 Mazda 616 | 2012 Chevrolet Malibu | |
Make | Mazda | Chevrolet |
Model | 616 | Malibu |
Year Released | 1978 | 2012 |
Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1586 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 79 HP | 252 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6300 RPM |
Torque | 124 Nm | 340 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4160 mm | 4872 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1786 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2852 mm |