1978 Mazda 626 vs. 1961 Volvo 220
To start off, 1978 Mazda 626 is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Volvo 220. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Volvo 220 would be higher. At 1,778 cc (4 cylinders), 1961 Volvo 220 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1978 Mazda 626 (93 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 19 more horse power than 1961 Volvo 220. (74 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1978 Mazda 626 should accelerate faster than 1961 Volvo 220. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1961 Volvo 220 weights approximately 20 kg more than 1978 Mazda 626.
Let's talk about torque, 1978 Mazda 626 (150 Nm @ 3300 RPM) has 6 more torque (in Nm) than 1961 Volvo 220. (144 Nm @ 2300 RPM). This means 1978 Mazda 626 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1961 Volvo 220.
Compare all specifications:
| 1978 Mazda 626 | 1961 Volvo 220 | |
| Make | Mazda | Volvo |
| Model | 626 | 220 |
| Year Released | 1978 | 1961 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1768 cc | 1778 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 93 HP | 74 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Torque | 150 Nm | 144 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3300 RPM | 2300 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 995 kg | 1015 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4310 mm | 4460 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1620 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2610 mm |
