1978 Mazda 626 vs. 1971 Triumph 2000
To start off, 1978 Mazda 626 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1971 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1971 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (6 cylinders), 1971 Triumph 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1978 Mazda 626 (93 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 10 more horse power than 1971 Triumph 2000. (83 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1978 Mazda 626 should accelerate faster than 1971 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1971 Triumph 2000 weights approximately 250 kg more than 1978 Mazda 626.
Let's talk about torque, 1978 Mazda 626 (150 Nm @ 3300 RPM) has 14 more torque (in Nm) than 1971 Triumph 2000. (136 Nm @ 2900 RPM). This means 1978 Mazda 626 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1971 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
1978 Mazda 626 | 1971 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | Mazda | Triumph |
Model | 626 | 2000 |
Year Released | 1978 | 1971 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1768 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 93 HP | 83 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 150 Nm | 136 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3300 RPM | 2900 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 995 kg | 1245 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4310 mm | 4510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2700 mm |