1978 Mazda 626 vs. 1982 Mini MK IV

To start off, 1982 Mini MK IV is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Mazda 626. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Mazda 626 would be higher. At 1,768 cc (4 cylinders), 1978 Mazda 626 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1978 Mazda 626 (93 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 59 more horse power than 1982 Mini MK IV. (34 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1978 Mazda 626 should accelerate faster than 1982 Mini MK IV. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1978 Mazda 626 weights approximately 383 kg more than 1982 Mini MK IV. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1978 Mazda 626 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1978 Mazda 626. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Mini MK IV, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1978 Mazda 626 (150 Nm @ 3300 RPM) has 89 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Mini MK IV. (61 Nm @ 2900 RPM). This means 1978 Mazda 626 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Mini MK IV.

Compare all specifications: