1978 Mazda 626 vs. 1996 Honda Integra
To start off, 1996 Honda Integra is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Mazda 626. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Mazda 626 would be higher. At 1,834 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Honda Integra is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Honda Integra weights approximately 154 kg more than 1978 Mazda 626.
Because 1978 Mazda 626 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1978 Mazda 626. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Honda Integra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1978 Mazda 626 | 1996 Honda Integra | |
Make | Mazda | Honda |
Model | 626 | Integra |
Year Released | 1978 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1586 cc | 1834 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 197 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1045 kg | 1199 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4310 mm | 4380 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1290 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2570 mm |