1978 Mazda 626 vs. 2002 Tata E
To start off, 2002 Tata E is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Mazda 626. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Mazda 626 would be higher. At 2,199 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Tata E is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Tata E weights approximately 325 kg more than 1978 Mazda 626.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1978 Mazda 626 | 2002 Tata E | |
| Make | Mazda | Tata |
| Model | 626 | E |
| Year Released | 1978 | 2002 |
| Engine Size | 1586 cc | 2199 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 148 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1045 kg | 1370 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4310 mm | 4750 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1750 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1440 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2810 mm |
