1978 Mazda 626 vs. 2006 SsangYong Stavic
To start off, 2006 SsangYong Stavic is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Mazda 626. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Mazda 626 would be higher. At 3,197 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 SsangYong Stavic is equipped with a bigger engine.
2006 SsangYong Stavic has automatic transmission and 1978 Mazda 626 has manual transmission. 1978 Mazda 626 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 SsangYong Stavic will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1978 Mazda 626 | 2006 SsangYong Stavic | |
Make | Mazda | SsangYong |
Model | 626 | Stavic |
Year Released | 1978 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1586 cc | 3197 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 217 HP |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1880 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 3010 mm |