1978 Mazda 626 vs. 2008 Smart Ultimate 112
To start off, 2008 Smart Ultimate 112 is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Mazda 626. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Mazda 626 would be higher. In terms of performance, 2008 Smart Ultimate 112 (110 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 17 more horse power than 1978 Mazda 626. (93 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Smart Ultimate 112 should accelerate faster than 1978 Mazda 626.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Smart Ultimate 112 (151 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 1 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 Mazda 626. (150 Nm @ 3300 RPM). This means 2008 Smart Ultimate 112 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 Mazda 626. 2008 Smart Ultimate 112 has automatic transmission and 1978 Mazda 626 has manual transmission. 1978 Mazda 626 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2008 Smart Ultimate 112 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1978 Mazda 626 | 2008 Smart Ultimate 112 | |
Make | Mazda | Smart |
Model | 626 | Ultimate 112 |
Year Released | 1978 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Horse Power | 93 HP | 110 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5750 RPM |
Torque | 150 Nm | 151 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3300 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1570 mm |