1978 Mazda 626 vs. 2009 Toyota Sequoia
To start off, 2009 Toyota Sequoia is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Mazda 626. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Mazda 626 would be higher. At 4,664 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Toyota Sequoia is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Toyota Sequoia (272 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 179 more horse power than 1978 Mazda 626. (93 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Toyota Sequoia should accelerate faster than 1978 Mazda 626.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Toyota Sequoia (315 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 165 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 Mazda 626. (150 Nm @ 3300 RPM). This means 2009 Toyota Sequoia will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 Mazda 626. 2009 Toyota Sequoia has automatic transmission and 1978 Mazda 626 has manual transmission. 1978 Mazda 626 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Toyota Sequoia will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1978 Mazda 626 | 2009 Toyota Sequoia | |
Make | Mazda | Toyota |
Model | 626 | Sequoia |
Year Released | 1978 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1768 cc | 4664 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 93 HP | 272 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 150 Nm | 315 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3300 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 2040 mm |