1978 Mazda 626 vs. 2010 Honda Civic
To start off, 2010 Honda Civic is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Mazda 626. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Mazda 626 would be higher. At 1,768 cc (4 cylinders), 1978 Mazda 626 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Honda Civic (99 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 6 more horse power than 1978 Mazda 626. (93 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Honda Civic should accelerate faster than 1978 Mazda 626.
Because 1978 Mazda 626 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1978 Mazda 626. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Honda Civic, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1978 Mazda 626 (150 Nm @ 3300 RPM) has 23 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Honda Civic. (127 Nm @ 4800 RPM). This means 1978 Mazda 626 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Honda Civic.
Compare all specifications:
1978 Mazda 626 | 2010 Honda Civic | |
Make | Mazda | Honda |
Model | 626 | Civic |
Year Released | 1978 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1768 cc | 1339 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 93 HP | 99 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 150 Nm | 127 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3300 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1785 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1460 mm |