1978 Mazda 818 vs. 2009 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2009 Ford Ecosport is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Mazda 818. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Mazda 818 would be higher. At 1,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Ford Ecosport is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1978 Mazda 818 (68 HP) has 1 more horse power than 2009 Ford Ecosport. (67 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1978 Mazda 818 should accelerate faster than 2009 Ford Ecosport.
Because 1978 Mazda 818 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1978 Mazda 818. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Ford Ecosport, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1978 Mazda 818 | 2009 Ford Ecosport | |
| Make | Mazda | Ford |
| Model | 818 | Ecosport |
| Year Released | 1978 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1272 cc | 1400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 68 HP | 67 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4080 mm | 4228 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1980 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1679 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2320 mm | 2490 mm |
