1978 Mazda 929 vs. 1962 Volvo 220
To start off, 1978 Mazda 929 is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Volvo 220. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Volvo 220 would be higher. At 1,778 cc (4 cylinders), 1962 Volvo 220 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1978 Mazda 929 (83 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 9 more horse power than 1962 Volvo 220. (74 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1978 Mazda 929 should accelerate faster than 1962 Volvo 220. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1978 Mazda 929 weights approximately 55 kg more than 1962 Volvo 220. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1962 Volvo 220 (144 Nm @ 2300 RPM) has 10 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 Mazda 929. (134 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1962 Volvo 220 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 Mazda 929.
Compare all specifications:
1978 Mazda 929 | 1962 Volvo 220 | |
Make | Mazda | Volvo |
Model | 929 | 220 |
Year Released | 1978 | 1962 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1769 cc | 1778 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 83 HP | 74 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque | 134 Nm | 144 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2300 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1070 kg | 1015 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4410 mm | 4460 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 45 L |