1978 Mazda 929 vs. 2000 Pontiac Piranha

To start off, 2000 Pontiac Piranha is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Mazda 929. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Mazda 929 would be higher. At 2,199 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Pontiac Piranha is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Pontiac Piranha (212 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 122 more horse power than 1978 Mazda 929. (90 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Pontiac Piranha should accelerate faster than 1978 Mazda 929. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Pontiac Piranha weights approximately 390 kg more than 1978 Mazda 929. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1978 Mazda 929 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1978 Mazda 929. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Pontiac Piranha, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Pontiac Piranha (203 Nm) has 43 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 Mazda 929. (160 Nm). This means 2000 Pontiac Piranha will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 Mazda 929.

Compare all specifications: