1978 Mazda 929 vs. 2004 Nissan X-Trail
To start off, 2004 Nissan X-Trail is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Mazda 929. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Mazda 929 would be higher. At 2,184 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Nissan X-Trail is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Nissan X-Trail (112 HP @ 2000 RPM) has 22 more horse power than 1978 Mazda 929. (90 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Nissan X-Trail should accelerate faster than 1978 Mazda 929. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Nissan X-Trail weights approximately 450 kg more than 1978 Mazda 929. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Nissan X-Trail is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1978 Mazda 929. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Nissan X-Trail will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Nissan X-Trail (270 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 110 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 Mazda 929. (160 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2004 Nissan X-Trail will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 Mazda 929.
Compare all specifications:
| 1978 Mazda 929 | 2004 Nissan X-Trail | |
| Make | Mazda | Nissan |
| Model | 929 | X-Trail |
| Year Released | 1978 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1970 cc | 2184 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 90 HP | 112 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 2000 RPM |
| Torque | 160 Nm | 270 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 2000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 80.1 mm | 86 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 98 mm | 94 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.6:1 | 16.0:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1150 kg | 1600 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2540 mm |
