1978 Mazda 929 vs. 2004 Seat Toledo

To start off, 2004 Seat Toledo is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Mazda 929. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Mazda 929 would be higher. At 1,769 cc (4 cylinders), 1978 Mazda 929 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Seat Toledo (99 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 16 more horse power than 1978 Mazda 929. (83 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Seat Toledo should accelerate faster than 1978 Mazda 929.

Because 1978 Mazda 929 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1978 Mazda 929. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Seat Toledo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Seat Toledo (149 Nm @ 3800 RPM) has 11 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 Mazda 929. (138 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2004 Seat Toledo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 Mazda 929.

Compare all specifications:

1978 Mazda 929 2004 Seat Toledo
Make Mazda Seat
Model 929 Toledo
Year Released 1978 2004
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1769 cc 1598 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 83 HP 99 HP
Engine RPM 5000 RPM 5400 RPM
Torque 138 Nm 149 Nm
Torque RPM 3000 RPM 3800 RPM
Engine Bore Size 80 mm 81 mm
Engine Stroke Size 88 mm 77.4 mm
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Front
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Length 4550 mm 4460 mm
Vehicle Width 1670 mm 1770 mm
Vehicle Height 1420 mm 1570 mm
Wheelbase Size 2370 mm 2600 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 65 L 34 L