1978 Mazda 929 vs. 2009 Holden Epica
To start off, 2009 Holden Epica is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Mazda 929. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Mazda 929 would be higher. At 2,492 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Holden Epica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Holden Epica (153 HP) has 70 more horse power than 1978 Mazda 929. (83 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Holden Epica should accelerate faster than 1978 Mazda 929.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Holden Epica (237 Nm) has 103 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 Mazda 929. (134 Nm). This means 2009 Holden Epica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 Mazda 929.
Compare all specifications:
| 1978 Mazda 929 | 2009 Holden Epica | |
| Make | Mazda | Holden |
| Model | 929 | Epica |
| Year Released | 1978 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1769 cc | 2492 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 83 HP | 153 HP |
| Torque | 134 Nm | 237 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4410 mm | 4805 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2700 mm |
