1978 Mazda 929 vs. 2010 Toyota Matrix
To start off, 2010 Toyota Matrix is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Mazda 929. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Mazda 929 would be higher. At 1,800 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Toyota Matrix is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Toyota Matrix (132 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 49 more horse power than 1978 Mazda 929. (83 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Toyota Matrix should accelerate faster than 1978 Mazda 929. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Toyota Matrix weights approximately 230 kg more than 1978 Mazda 929. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Toyota Matrix (173 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 39 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 Mazda 929. (134 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2010 Toyota Matrix will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 Mazda 929.
Compare all specifications:
1978 Mazda 929 | 2010 Toyota Matrix | |
Make | Mazda | Toyota |
Model | 929 | Matrix |
Year Released | 1978 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1769 cc | 1800 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 83 HP | 132 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 134 Nm | 173 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1070 kg | 1300 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4410 mm | 4366 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1765 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1549 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2601 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 50 L |