1978 Mazda 929 vs. 2010 Toyota Tundra
To start off, 2010 Toyota Tundra is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Mazda 929. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Mazda 929 would be higher. At 4,664 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Toyota Tundra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Toyota Tundra (276 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 193 more horse power than 1978 Mazda 929. (83 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Toyota Tundra should accelerate faster than 1978 Mazda 929. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Toyota Tundra weights approximately 10 kg more than 1978 Mazda 929. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Toyota Tundra (424 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 290 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 Mazda 929. (134 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2010 Toyota Tundra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 Mazda 929.
Compare all specifications:
1978 Mazda 929 | 2010 Toyota Tundra | |
Make | Mazda | Toyota |
Model | 929 | Tundra |
Year Released | 1978 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1769 cc | 4664 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 83 HP | 276 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 134 Nm | 424 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1070 kg | 1080 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4410 mm | 5340 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 2040 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1940 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 3230 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 100 L |