1978 Mazda 929 vs. 2012 Ford C-Max
To start off, 2012 Ford C-Max is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Mazda 929. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Mazda 929 would be higher. At 1,769 cc (4 cylinders), 1978 Mazda 929 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Ford C-Max (150 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 67 more horse power than 1978 Mazda 929. (83 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Ford C-Max should accelerate faster than 1978 Mazda 929. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Ford C-Max weights approximately 305 kg more than 1978 Mazda 929. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2012 Ford C-Max (240 Nm @ 1600 RPM) has 106 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 Mazda 929. (134 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2012 Ford C-Max will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 Mazda 929.
Compare all specifications:
1978 Mazda 929 | 2012 Ford C-Max | |
Make | Mazda | Ford |
Model | 929 | C-Max |
Year Released | 1978 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1769 cc | 1596 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 83 HP | 150 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5700 RPM |
Torque | 134 Nm | 240 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 1600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1070 kg | 1375 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4410 mm | 4380 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1828 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1626 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2648 mm |