1978 Mazda 929 vs. 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE
To start off, 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Mazda 929. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Mazda 929 would be higher. At 6,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE (397 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 307 more horse power than 1978 Mazda 929. (90 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE should accelerate faster than 1978 Mazda 929. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE weights approximately 1542 kg more than 1978 Mazda 929. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1978 Mazda 929. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE (565 Nm @ 4300 RPM) has 405 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 Mazda 929. (160 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 Mazda 929.
Compare all specifications:
1978 Mazda 929 | 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE | |
Make | Mazda | Cadillac |
Model | 929 | ESCALADE |
Year Released | 1978 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1970 cc | 6200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 90 HP | 397 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5700 RPM |
Torque | 160 Nm | 565 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 4300 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 80.1 mm | 103 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 98 mm | 92 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.6:1 | 10.4 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1150 kg | 2692 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4640 mm | 5639 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 2009 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1892 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 3302 mm |