1978 Mazda Cosmo vs. 1953 Opel Rekord
To start off, 1978 Mazda Cosmo is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Opel Rekord. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Opel Rekord would be higher. At 1,769 cc (4 cylinders), 1978 Mazda Cosmo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1978 Mazda Cosmo (93 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 49 more horse power than 1953 Opel Rekord. (44 HP @ 3900 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1978 Mazda Cosmo should accelerate faster than 1953 Opel Rekord. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1978 Mazda Cosmo weights approximately 156 kg more than 1953 Opel Rekord. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1978 Mazda Cosmo | 1953 Opel Rekord | |
Make | Mazda | Opel |
Model | Cosmo | Rekord |
Year Released | 1978 | 1953 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1769 cc | 1488 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 93 HP | 44 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 3900 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1092 kg | 936 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4250 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2490 mm |