1978 Mazda Cosmo vs. 1956 Toyota Super
To start off, 1978 Mazda Cosmo is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Toyota Super. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Toyota Super would be higher. At 1,769 cc (4 cylinders), 1978 Mazda Cosmo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1978 Mazda Cosmo (93 HP) has 53 more horse power than 1956 Toyota Super. (40 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1978 Mazda Cosmo should accelerate faster than 1956 Toyota Super.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1978 Mazda Cosmo | 1956 Toyota Super | |
Make | Mazda | Toyota |
Model | Cosmo | Super |
Year Released | 1978 | 1956 |
Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1769 cc | 1453 cc |
Horse Power | 93 HP | 40 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |