1978 Mazda Cosmo vs. 1964 Plymouth Valiant
To start off, 1978 Mazda Cosmo is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Plymouth Valiant. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Plymouth Valiant would be higher. At 4,474 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Plymouth Valiant is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1978 Mazda Cosmo | 1964 Plymouth Valiant | |
Make | Mazda | Plymouth |
Model | Cosmo | Valiant |
Year Released | 1978 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1769 cc | 4474 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 93 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2700 mm |