1978 Mazda Cosmo vs. 1997 MCC Smart
To start off, 1997 MCC Smart is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 1,769 cc (4 cylinders), 1978 Mazda Cosmo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1978 Mazda Cosmo (93 HP) has 40 more horse power than 1997 MCC Smart. (53 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1978 Mazda Cosmo should accelerate faster than 1997 MCC Smart. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1978 Mazda Cosmo weights approximately 442 kg more than 1997 MCC Smart. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1978 Mazda Cosmo | 1997 MCC Smart | |
| Make | Mazda | MCC |
| Model | Cosmo | Smart |
| Year Released | 1978 | 1997 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 1769 cc | 599 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 93 HP | 53 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1092 kg | 650 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 2510 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1460 mm |
