1978 Mazda Cosmo vs. 1999 Mitsubishi SUW
To start off, 1999 Mitsubishi SUW is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 1,769 cc (4 cylinders), 1978 Mazda Cosmo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Mitsubishi SUW (114 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 21 more horse power than 1978 Mazda Cosmo. (93 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Mitsubishi SUW should accelerate faster than 1978 Mazda Cosmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Mitsubishi SUW weights approximately 813 kg more than 1978 Mazda Cosmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1978 Mazda Cosmo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1978 Mazda Cosmo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Mitsubishi SUW, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Mitsubishi SUW (240 Nm) has 90 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 Mazda Cosmo. (150 Nm). This means 1999 Mitsubishi SUW will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 Mazda Cosmo. 1999 Mitsubishi SUW has automatic transmission and 1978 Mazda Cosmo has manual transmission. 1978 Mazda Cosmo will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1999 Mitsubishi SUW will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1978 Mazda Cosmo | 1999 Mitsubishi SUW | |
Make | Mazda | Mitsubishi |
Model | Cosmo | SUW |
Year Released | 1978 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1769 cc | 1099 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 93 HP | 114 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 150 Nm | 240 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1092 kg | 1905 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2630 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 74 L |