1978 Mazda RX-2 vs. 1979 Mazda 616
To start off, 1979 Mazda 616 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Mazda RX-2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Mazda RX-2 would be higher. At 2,290 cc, 1978 Mazda RX-2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1978 Mazda RX-2 (118 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 39 more horse power than 1979 Mazda 616. (79 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1978 Mazda RX-2 should accelerate faster than 1979 Mazda 616. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1978 Mazda RX-2 weights approximately 50 kg more than 1979 Mazda 616. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1978 Mazda RX-2 (157 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 33 more torque (in Nm) than 1979 Mazda 616. (124 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1978 Mazda RX-2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1979 Mazda 616.
Compare all specifications:
1978 Mazda RX-2 | 1979 Mazda 616 | |
Make | Mazda | Mazda |
Model | RX-2 | 616 |
Year Released | 1978 | 1979 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2290 cc | 1585 cc |
Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
Horse Power | 118 HP | 79 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 157 Nm | 124 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 960 kg | 910 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4160 mm | 4160 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1590 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2480 mm |