1978 Mazda RX-2 vs. 1993 Renault Clio
To start off, 1993 Renault Clio is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Mazda RX-2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Mazda RX-2 would be higher. At 2,290 cc, 1978 Mazda RX-2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1993 Renault Clio (138 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 20 more horse power than 1978 Mazda RX-2. (118 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1993 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1978 Mazda RX-2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1993 Renault Clio weights approximately 15 kg more than 1978 Mazda RX-2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1993 Renault Clio (187 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 30 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 Mazda RX-2. (157 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1993 Renault Clio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 Mazda RX-2.
Compare all specifications:
| 1978 Mazda RX-2 | 1993 Renault Clio | |
| Make | Mazda | Renault |
| Model | RX-2 | Clio |
| Year Released | 1978 | 1993 |
| Engine Size | 2290 cc | 1764 cc |
| Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
| Horse Power | 118 HP | 138 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Torque | 157 Nm | 187 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4250 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 960 kg | 975 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4160 mm | 3710 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1400 mm |
