1978 Mazda RX-2 vs. 2004 Mercedes-Benz C
To start off, 2004 Mercedes-Benz C is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Mazda RX-2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Mazda RX-2 would be higher. At 2,290 cc, 1978 Mazda RX-2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mercedes-Benz C (148 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 30 more horse power than 1978 Mazda RX-2. (118 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mercedes-Benz C should accelerate faster than 1978 Mazda RX-2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mercedes-Benz C weights approximately 505 kg more than 1978 Mazda RX-2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mercedes-Benz C (220 Nm) has 63 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 Mazda RX-2. (157 Nm). This means 2004 Mercedes-Benz C will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 Mazda RX-2.
Compare all specifications:
1978 Mazda RX-2 | 2004 Mercedes-Benz C | |
Make | Mazda | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | RX-2 | C |
Year Released | 1978 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2290 cc | 1795 cc |
Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
Horse Power | 118 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque | 157 Nm | 220 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 960 kg | 1465 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4160 mm | 4350 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2720 mm |