1978 Mazda RX-2 vs. 2012 Audi A3
To start off, 2012 Audi A3 is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Mazda RX-2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Mazda RX-2 would be higher. At 2,290 cc, 1978 Mazda RX-2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1978 Mazda RX-2 (118 HP) has 14 more horse power than 2012 Audi A3. (104 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1978 Mazda RX-2 should accelerate faster than 2012 Audi A3.
Because 1978 Mazda RX-2 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1978 Mazda RX-2. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Audi A3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1978 Mazda RX-2 | 2012 Audi A3 | |
| Make | Mazda | Audi |
| Model | RX-2 | A3 |
| Year Released | 1978 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2290 cc | 1600 cc |
| Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
| Horse Power | 118 HP | 104 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
