1978 Mazda RX-2 vs. 2012 Holden Colorado
To start off, 2012 Holden Colorado is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Mazda RX-2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Mazda RX-2 would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Holden Colorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Holden Colorado (123 HP) has 5 more horse power than 1978 Mazda RX-2. (118 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Holden Colorado should accelerate faster than 1978 Mazda RX-2.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Holden Colorado (207 Nm) has 50 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 Mazda RX-2. (157 Nm). This means 2012 Holden Colorado will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 Mazda RX-2.
Compare all specifications:
| 1978 Mazda RX-2 | 2012 Holden Colorado | |
| Make | Mazda | Holden |
| Model | RX-2 | Colorado |
| Year Released | 1978 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2290 cc | 2400 cc |
| Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
| Horse Power | 118 HP | 123 HP |
| Torque | 157 Nm | 207 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
