1978 Mazda RX-3 vs. 1960 NSU Sport
To start off, 1978 Mazda RX-3 is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 NSU Sport. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 NSU Sport would be higher. At 1,963 cc, 1978 Mazda RX-3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1978 Mazda RX-3 (100 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 70 more horse power than 1960 NSU Sport. (30 HP @ 5700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1978 Mazda RX-3 should accelerate faster than 1960 NSU Sport. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1978 Mazda RX-3 weights approximately 334 kg more than 1960 NSU Sport. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1978 Mazda RX-3 | 1960 NSU Sport | |
| Make | Mazda | NSU |
| Model | RX-3 | Sport |
| Year Released | 1978 | 1960 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 1963 cc | 583 cc |
| Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
| Horse Power | 100 HP | 30 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 5700 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 850 kg | 516 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4090 mm | 3630 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1450 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1250 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2320 mm | 2010 mm |
