1978 Mazda RX-3 vs. 1982 Opel Rekord
To start off, 1982 Opel Rekord is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Mazda RX-3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Mazda RX-3 would be higher. At 1,963 cc, 1978 Mazda RX-3 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Opel Rekord weights approximately 250 kg more than 1978 Mazda RX-3.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1978 Mazda RX-3 | 1982 Opel Rekord | |
| Make | Mazda | Opel |
| Model | RX-3 | Rekord |
| Year Released | 1978 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1963 cc | 1689 cc |
| Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
| Horse Power | 100 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 850 kg | 1100 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4090 mm | 4630 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1740 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1480 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2320 mm | 2680 mm |
