1978 Mazda RX-3 vs. 2006 Mercedes-Benz CK
To start off, 2006 Mercedes-Benz CK is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Mazda RX-3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Mazda RX-3 would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Mercedes-Benz CK is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mercedes-Benz CK (522 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 387 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 Mazda RX-3. (135 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2006 Mercedes-Benz CK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 Mazda RX-3.
Compare all specifications:
| 1978 Mazda RX-3 | 2006 Mercedes-Benz CK | |
| Make | Mazda | Mercedes-Benz |
| Model | RX-3 | CK |
| Year Released | 1978 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1963 cc | 3500 cc |
| Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | V |
| Horse Power | 100 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 135 Nm | 522 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4090 mm | 4090 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1790 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1300 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2320 mm | 2440 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 70 L |
