1978 Mazda RX-3 vs. 2006 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 2006 Mitsubishi Colt is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Mazda RX-3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Mazda RX-3 would be higher. At 2,972 cc, 2006 Mitsubishi Colt is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mitsubishi Colt (179 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 79 more horse power than 1978 Mazda RX-3. (100 HP @ 7000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mitsubishi Colt should accelerate faster than 1978 Mazda RX-3.
Because 2006 Mitsubishi Colt is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1978 Mazda RX-3. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Mitsubishi Colt will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mitsubishi Colt (255 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 120 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 Mazda RX-3. (135 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2006 Mitsubishi Colt will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 Mazda RX-3.
Compare all specifications:
| 1978 Mazda RX-3 | 2006 Mitsubishi Colt | |
| Make | Mazda | Mitsubishi |
| Model | RX-3 | Colt |
| Year Released | 1978 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1963 cc | 2972 cc |
| Horse Power | 100 HP | 179 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Torque | 135 Nm | 255 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4090 mm | 4940 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1810 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2320 mm | 2970 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 95 L |
