1978 Mercedes-Benz 280 vs. 2012 Ford Kuga
To start off, 2012 Ford Kuga is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Mercedes-Benz 280. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Mercedes-Benz 280 would be higher. At 2,746 cc (6 cylinders), 1978 Mercedes-Benz 280 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Ford Kuga (197 HP) has 15 more horse power than 1978 Mercedes-Benz 280. (182 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Ford Kuga should accelerate faster than 1978 Mercedes-Benz 280.
Because 2012 Ford Kuga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1978 Mercedes-Benz 280. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Ford Kuga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1978 Mercedes-Benz 280 has automatic transmission and 2012 Ford Kuga has manual transmission. 2012 Ford Kuga will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1978 Mercedes-Benz 280 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1978 Mercedes-Benz 280 | 2012 Ford Kuga | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Ford |
Model | 280 | Kuga |
Year Released | 1978 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2746 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 182 HP | 197 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4730 mm | 4450 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1720 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 53 L |