1978 Mercedes-Benz T vs. 1997 Honda CR-V
To start off, 1997 Honda CR-V is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Mercedes-Benz T. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Mercedes-Benz T would be higher. At 2,307 cc (4 cylinders), 1978 Mercedes-Benz T is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Honda CR-V weights approximately 150 kg more than 1978 Mercedes-Benz T.
Because 1978 Mercedes-Benz T is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1978 Mercedes-Benz T. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Honda CR-V, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1978 Mercedes-Benz T | 1997 Honda CR-V | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Honda |
Model | T | CR-V |
Year Released | 1978 | 1997 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2307 cc | 1999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 128 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1350 kg | 1500 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4650 mm | 4560 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1700 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2620 mm |