1978 Mercury Cougar vs. 1952 Renault Colorale
To start off, 1978 Mercury Cougar is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Renault Colorale. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Renault Colorale would be higher. At 4,941 cc (8 cylinders), 1978 Mercury Cougar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1978 Mercury Cougar (133 HP) has 88 more horse power than 1952 Renault Colorale. (45 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1978 Mercury Cougar should accelerate faster than 1952 Renault Colorale. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1978 Mercury Cougar weights approximately 245 kg more than 1952 Renault Colorale. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1978 Mercury Cougar | 1952 Renault Colorale | |
| Make | Mercury | Renault |
| Model | Cougar | Colorale |
| Year Released | 1978 | 1952 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4941 cc | 2383 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 133 HP | 45 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1855 kg | 1610 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5480 mm | 4280 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1990 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1760 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 2670 mm |
