1978 Mercury Cougar vs. 1970 Triumph 2000
To start off, 1978 Mercury Cougar is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 4,941 cc (8 cylinders), 1978 Mercury Cougar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1978 Mercury Cougar (133 HP @ 3400 RPM) has 50 more horse power than 1970 Triumph 2000. (83 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1978 Mercury Cougar should accelerate faster than 1970 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1978 Mercury Cougar weights approximately 610 kg more than 1970 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1978 Mercury Cougar (336 Nm @ 1600 RPM) has 201 more torque (in Nm) than 1970 Triumph 2000. (135 Nm @ 2900 RPM). This means 1978 Mercury Cougar will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1970 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
1978 Mercury Cougar | 1970 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | Mercury | Triumph |
Model | Cougar | 2000 |
Year Released | 1978 | 1970 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4941 cc | 1997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 133 HP | 83 HP |
Engine RPM | 3400 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 336 Nm | 135 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1600 RPM | 2900 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1855 kg | 1245 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5480 mm | 4510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 2700 mm |