1978 Mitsubishi Celeste vs. 1964 Singer Vogue III
To start off, 1978 Mitsubishi Celeste is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Singer Vogue III. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Singer Vogue III would be higher. At 1,995 cc (4 cylinders), 1978 Mitsubishi Celeste is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1978 Mitsubishi Celeste (123 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 44 more horse power than 1964 Singer Vogue III. (79 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1978 Mitsubishi Celeste should accelerate faster than 1964 Singer Vogue III.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1978 Mitsubishi Celeste | 1964 Singer Vogue III | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Singer |
| Model | Celeste | Vogue III |
| Year Released | 1978 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1995 cc | 1592 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 123 HP | 79 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 81.5 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 76.2 mm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4120 mm | 4250 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1610 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1490 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2570 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 47 L |
