1978 Mitsubishi Celeste vs. 2012 Peugeot 408
To start off, 2012 Peugeot 408 is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Mitsubishi Celeste. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Mitsubishi Celeste would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Peugeot 408 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Peugeot 408 (147 HP) has 73 more horse power than 1978 Mitsubishi Celeste. (74 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Peugeot 408 should accelerate faster than 1978 Mitsubishi Celeste.
Because 1978 Mitsubishi Celeste is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1978 Mitsubishi Celeste. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Peugeot 408, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Peugeot 408 (200 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 82 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 Mitsubishi Celeste. (118 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2012 Peugeot 408 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 Mitsubishi Celeste.
Compare all specifications:
1978 Mitsubishi Celeste | 2012 Peugeot 408 | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Peugeot |
Model | Celeste | 408 |
Year Released | 1978 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1410 cc | 1997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 147 HP |
Torque | 118 Nm | 200 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4160 mm | 4680 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1815 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1525 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2710 mm |