1978 Mitsubishi Colt vs. 2005 Renault Clio
To start off, 2005 Renault Clio is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Mitsubishi Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Mitsubishi Colt would be higher. At 1,598 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Renault Clio weights approximately 330 kg more than 1978 Mitsubishi Colt.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1978 Mitsubishi Colt | 2005 Renault Clio | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Renault |
Model | Colt | Clio |
Year Released | 1978 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1244 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 74 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 810 kg | 1140 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3800 mm | 3990 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1500 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2310 mm | 2570 mm |