1978 Mitsubishi Colt vs. 2006 SSC Aero
To start off, 2006 SSC Aero is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Mitsubishi Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Mitsubishi Colt would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 SSC Aero is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 SSC Aero weights approximately 483 kg more than 1978 Mitsubishi Colt.
Because 2006 SSC Aero is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 SSC Aero. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1978 Mitsubishi Colt, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1978 Mitsubishi Colt | 2006 SSC Aero | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | SSC |
| Model | Colt | Aero |
| Year Released | 1978 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 1244 cc | 6000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 1062 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 810 kg | 1293 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3800 mm | 4470 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 2080 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1090 mm |
