1978 Mitsubishi Colt vs. 2010 Ford Expedition
To start off, 2010 Ford Expedition is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Mitsubishi Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Mitsubishi Colt would be higher. At 5,400 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Ford Expedition is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Ford Expedition weights approximately 1845 kg more than 1978 Mitsubishi Colt.
Because 2010 Ford Expedition is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 Ford Expedition. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1978 Mitsubishi Colt, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2010 Ford Expedition has automatic transmission and 1978 Mitsubishi Colt has manual transmission. 1978 Mitsubishi Colt will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Ford Expedition will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1978 Mitsubishi Colt | 2010 Ford Expedition | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Ford |
Model | Colt | Expedition |
Year Released | 1978 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1244 cc | 5400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 310 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 810 kg | 2655 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3800 mm | 5621 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 2002 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1974 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2310 mm | 3327 mm |