1978 Mitsubishi Jeep vs. 2000 Rover 45
To start off, 2000 Rover 45 is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Mitsubishi Jeep. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Mitsubishi Jeep would be higher. At 2,384 cc (4 cylinders), 1978 Mitsubishi Jeep is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 102 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1978 Mitsubishi Jeep weights approximately 419 kg more than 2000 Rover 45.
Because 1978 Mitsubishi Jeep is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Rover 45. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1978 Mitsubishi Jeep will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1978 Mitsubishi Jeep (197 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 70 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Rover 45. (127 Nm @ 5000 RPM). This means 1978 Mitsubishi Jeep will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Rover 45.
Compare all specifications:
1978 Mitsubishi Jeep | 2000 Rover 45 | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Rover |
Model | Jeep | 45 |
Year Released | 1978 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2384 cc | 1394 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 102 HP | 102 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 197 Nm | 127 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1524 kg | 1105 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4300 mm | 4370 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1900 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2630 mm |