1978 Mitsubishi Lancer vs. 2012 Chevrolet Equinox
To start off, 2012 Chevrolet Equinox is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Mitsubishi Lancer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Mitsubishi Lancer would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Chevrolet Equinox is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Chevrolet Equinox (182 HP @ 6700 RPM) has 129 more horse power than 1978 Mitsubishi Lancer. (53 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Chevrolet Equinox should accelerate faster than 1978 Mitsubishi Lancer. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Chevrolet Equinox weights approximately 853 kg more than 1978 Mitsubishi Lancer. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2012 Chevrolet Equinox (233 Nm @ 4900 RPM) has 148 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 Mitsubishi Lancer. (85 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2012 Chevrolet Equinox will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 Mitsubishi Lancer.
Compare all specifications:
1978 Mitsubishi Lancer | 2012 Chevrolet Equinox | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Chevrolet |
Model | Lancer | Equinox |
Year Released | 1978 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1238 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 53 HP | 182 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6700 RPM |
Torque | 85 Nm | 233 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4900 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 860 kg | 1713 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 4770 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 1842 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1684 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2858 mm |