1978 Monteverdi Sahara vs. 1954 Triumph TR2
To start off, 1978 Monteverdi Sahara is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Triumph TR2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Triumph TR2 would be higher. At 3,253 cc (6 cylinders), 1978 Monteverdi Sahara is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1954 Triumph TR2 (90 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 9 more horse power than 1978 Monteverdi Sahara. (81 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1954 Triumph TR2 should accelerate faster than 1978 Monteverdi Sahara.
Because 1954 Triumph TR2 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1954 Triumph TR2. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1978 Monteverdi Sahara, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1978 Monteverdi Sahara has automatic transmission and 1954 Triumph TR2 has manual transmission. 1954 Triumph TR2 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1978 Monteverdi Sahara will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1978 Monteverdi Sahara | 1954 Triumph TR2 | |
Make | Monteverdi | Triumph |
Model | Sahara | TR2 |
Year Released | 1978 | 1954 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3253 cc | 1991 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 81 HP | 90 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4350 mm | 3840 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2250 mm |