1978 Monteverdi Sahara vs. 1960 Nissan Bluebird
To start off, 1978 Monteverdi Sahara is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Nissan Bluebird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Nissan Bluebird would be higher. At 3,253 cc (6 cylinders), 1978 Monteverdi Sahara is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1978 Monteverdi Sahara (81 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 38 more horse power than 1960 Nissan Bluebird. (43 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1978 Monteverdi Sahara should accelerate faster than 1960 Nissan Bluebird.
Because 1960 Nissan Bluebird is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1978 Monteverdi Sahara. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1960 Nissan Bluebird will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1978 Monteverdi Sahara | 1960 Nissan Bluebird | |
Make | Monteverdi | Nissan |
Model | Sahara | Bluebird |
Year Released | 1978 | 1960 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3253 cc | 988 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 81 HP | 43 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Vehicle Length | 4350 mm | 3870 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2290 mm |