1978 Monteverdi Sahara vs. 1960 Seat 1400
To start off, 1978 Monteverdi Sahara is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Seat 1400. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Seat 1400 would be higher. At 3,253 cc (6 cylinders), 1978 Monteverdi Sahara is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1978 Monteverdi Sahara (81 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 32 more horse power than 1960 Seat 1400. (49 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1978 Monteverdi Sahara should accelerate faster than 1960 Seat 1400.
Because 1960 Seat 1400 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Seat 1400. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1978 Monteverdi Sahara, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1978 Monteverdi Sahara has automatic transmission and 1960 Seat 1400 has manual transmission. 1960 Seat 1400 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1978 Monteverdi Sahara will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1978 Monteverdi Sahara | 1960 Seat 1400 | |
| Make | Monteverdi | Seat |
| Model | Sahara | 1400 |
| Year Released | 1978 | 1960 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3253 cc | 1394 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 81 HP | 49 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 4350 mm | 4470 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2660 mm |
