1978 Monteverdi Sahara vs. 1980 Volvo 66
To start off, 1980 Volvo 66 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Monteverdi Sahara. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Monteverdi Sahara would be higher. At 3,253 cc (6 cylinders), 1978 Monteverdi Sahara is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1978 Monteverdi Sahara (81 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 34 more horse power than 1980 Volvo 66. (47 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1978 Monteverdi Sahara should accelerate faster than 1980 Volvo 66.
Because 1980 Volvo 66 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Volvo 66. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1978 Monteverdi Sahara, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1978 Monteverdi Sahara has automatic transmission and 1980 Volvo 66 has manual transmission. 1980 Volvo 66 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1978 Monteverdi Sahara will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1978 Monteverdi Sahara | 1980 Volvo 66 | |
| Make | Monteverdi | Volvo |
| Model | Sahara | 66 |
| Year Released | 1978 | 1980 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3253 cc | 1108 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 81 HP | 47 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 4350 mm | 3910 mm |
